PDB37 COST-MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS COMPARING BASAL ANALOGUE INSULINS IN HUNGARY
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
New Long-Acting Basal Insulins: Does Benefit Outweigh Cost?
Although insulin introduced nearly a century ago has saved the lives of countless people with diabetes, improvements of this therapy continue as significant unmet needs remain (1–4). Even persons with type 2 diabetes who, compared with those with type 1 diabetes, exhibit a much more stable, yet disordered, metabolic milieu only achieve an intended HbA1c target of 7% or lower without hypoglycemi...
متن کاملConcentrated insulins: the new basal insulins
INTRODUCTION Insulin therapy plays a critical role in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, there is still a need to find basal insulins with 24-hour coverage and reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Additionally, with increasing obesity and insulin resistance, the ability to provide clinically necessary high doses of insulin at low volume is also needed. AREAS COVERED This ...
متن کاملCardiovascular effects of basal insulins
Basal insulin is an important component of treatment for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. One of the principal aims of treatment in patients with diabetes is the prevention of diabetic complications, including cardiovascular disease. There is some evidence, although controversial, that attainment of good glycemic control reduces long-term cardiovascular risk in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. ...
متن کاملEconomic analysis of epilepsy treatment: a cost minimization analysis comparing carbamazepine and lamotrigine in the UK
New anti-epileptic drugs differ from existing standard therapies not in their clinical efficacy, but in their side-effects profiles. To determine the relative economic value of these agents, one must compare drug costs, costs of resources employed in the management of adverse events, and costs associated with therapeutic switching. In this economic analysis, carbamazepine (CBZ) and lamotrigine ...
متن کاملThe death of cost-minimization analysis?
Four different types of evaluation methods, cost-benefit analysis (CBA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-minimization analysis (CMA), are usually distinguished. In this note, we pronounce the (near) death of CMA by showing the rare circumstances under which CMA is an appropriate method of analysis. We argue that it is inappropriate for separate and sequen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Value in Health
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1098-3015
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(10)75015-4